By Jeremy Deaton
Earlier this week, California Governor Jerry Brown (D) signed an executive order setting a goal of reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2045, arguably the most significant climate target ever set. But in the days after Brown’s announcement, activists took to the street to say, “Not good enough.” Hundreds marched outside the Moscone Center in San Francisco Thursday, calling on Brown to put an end to fossil fuel extraction in California, temporarily preventing delegates to the Global Climate Action Summit from entering the building.
The scene captured the tension between advocates and policymakers, namely that climate change is so big and unwieldy that even the most ambitious policies seem insufficient. Inside the convention center, mayors, governors and business leaders gathered to discuss their plans to fight climate change, and throughout the conference, advocates called on officials to do more.
“Governor Brown preaches the climate gospel on the global stage, but his policies have allowed fossil fuel companies to create a living hell for Californians whose health and safety are threatened by toxic drilling operations,” said Cesar G. Aguirre, an organizer with the Central California Environmental Justice Network. “Governor Brown has failed, but a new generation of leaders is rising up from the grassroots and they bring the courage that politicians like Brown sorely lack.”
Responding to a question about his critics at a press conference Thursday, Brown said, “For every position, there’s a counter-position. For every counter-position, there’s a counter-counter-position,” regarding demands to cut oil production. “You don’t snap your fingers and say, ‘Now it’s done.’ It takes a process. It takes stakeholder involvement, and that’s the way it is.”
At the press conference, Brown and the governors of Washington, Hawaii and Connecticut announced new commitments from the United States Climate Alliance, a group of 16 states and Puerto Rico committed to meeting their share of the U.S. pledge under the Paris agreement. Governors said they plan to better manage farms, forests and ranches that soak up carbon from the atmosphere.
They also plan to cut emissions of powerful but short-lived pollutants like methane, which leaks from farms and gas drilling sites, and hydrofluorocarbons, which are used in air conditioners and refrigerators. Governors further say they plan to invest in electric-vehicle charging stations and foster the growth of solar power, which has been slowed by President Trump’s tariffs on imported solar cells.
Protestors at the Global Climate Action Summit, September 13, 2018. CREDIT: Nexus Media
The Global Climate Action Summit produced similar announcements from state and local leaders from across the world. Mayors declared that in 27 cities — including London, Paris, New York, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago and San Francisco— emissions have peaked and fallen even as economies have grown. Meanwhile, leaders of 21 tech companies — including Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, Lyft and Uber — pledged to draw down emissions.
Together, public officials and business leaders are trying to forge a path forward on climate change even as President Trump throws up roadblocks as fast as he can — rolling back fuel standards, weakening emissions limits on power plants, and moving to exit the Paris Agreement, undermining international efforts to stem climate change. The various alliances of mayors, governors and CEOs were formed after Trump’s election, Washington Governor Jay Inslee (D) said, “to make sure that the rest of the world understood that there is intelligent life in the United States.”
Advocates know, however, that the combined efforts of these groups will likely fall short of U.S. commitments under the Paris Agreement. A new report from Yale finds the carbon-cutting pledges of states, cities and businesses will only get the United States halfway to its goal. And, even if the United States managed to fulfill its pledge under the Paris Agreement, it would still fall short of doing enough to keep warming under 2 degrees C, the stated goal of the accord.
Given these facts, advocates say they are left with little choice but to continue to push climate-conscious leaders like Brown, no matter how much he may accomplish. The White House is undoing climate policy as fast as it can, putting the burden of progress on state and local officials. So, while inside the San Francisco summit, politicians and policy wonks celebrated incremental progress, activists outside rallied for radical change.
Brown’s colleagues defended him against charges that he has done too little on climate change. “Governor Brown’s leadership on this issue over the years is second to none,” said Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy (R). “Quite frankly, I wish I could have done as much as Governor Brown has.” To Brown’s critics, Dannel said, “You’ve had one hell of run.”
It’s easy to see why governors would come to Brown’s defense. Ambitious climate policy is difficult to pass, even in deep-blue states like Washington, where, earlier this year, Inslee failed to enact a carbon tax despite the fact that Democrats controlled the state legislature. Brown succeeded in California only with overwhelming support in the statehouse and a healthy dollop of political savvy.
Though Brown has accomplished a lot on climate change, activists believe that even the most ambitious leader cannot stop catastrophic climate change through patience and compromise. They have called for immediate and drastic change. Several were arrested rallying outside the summit.
In defending himself, Brown argued that it is possible to make progress from within the system. “We’re definitely moving in the same direction as the critics,” he said. “They would just like us to go a little faster, we would like to go a little faster ourselves.”
Read more: thinkprogress.org